Dang, Shilpa

Background: Functional integration or connectivity in brain is directional, non-linear as well as variable in time-lagged dependence. Deep neural networks (DNN) have become an indispensable tool everywhere, by learning higher levels of abstract and complex patterns from raw data. However, in neuroscientific community they generally work as black-boxes, leading to the explanation of results difficult and less intuitive. We aim to propose a brain-connectivity measure based on an explainable NN (xNN) approach. New Method: We build a NN-based predictor for regression problem. Since we aim to determine the contribution/relevance of past data-point from one region i in the prediction of current data-point from another region j, i.e. the higher-order connectivity between two brain-regions, we employ layer-wise relevance propagation (Bach et al., 2015) (LRP, a method for explaining DNN predictions), which has not been done before to the best of our knowledge. Specifically, we propose a novel score depending on weights as a quantitative measure of connectivity, called as relative relevance score (xNN-RRS). The RRS is an intuitive and transparent score. We provide an interpretation of the trained NN weights with-respect-to the brain-connectivity. Results: Face validity of our approach is demonstrated with experiments on simulated data, over existing methods. We also demonstrate construct validity of xNN-RRS in a resting-state fMRI experiment. Comparison: Our approach shows superior performance, in terms of accuracy and computational complexity, over existing state-of-the-art methods for brain-connectivity estimation. Conclusion: The proposed method is promising to serve as a first post-hoc explainable NN-approach for brain-connectivity analysis in clinical applications.

Past reward associations may be signalled from different sensory modalities; however, it remains unclear how different types of reward-associated stimuli modulate sensory perception. In this human fMRI study (female and male participants), a visual target was simultaneously presented with either an intra- (visual) or a cross-modal (auditory) cue that was previously associated with rewards. We hypothesized that depending on the sensory modality of the cues, distinct neural mechanisms underlie the value-driven modulation of visual processing. Using a multivariate approach, we confirmed that reward-associated cues enhanced the target representation in early visual areas and identified the brain valuation regions. Then, using an effective connectivity analysis, we tested three possible patterns of connectivity that could underlie the modulation of the visual cortex: a direct pathway from the frontal valuation areas to the visual areas, a mediated pathway through the attention-related areas, and a mediated pathway that additionally involved sensory association areas. We found evidence for the third model demonstrating that the reward-related information in both sensory modalities is communicated across the valuation and attention-related brain regions. Additionally, the superior temporal areas were recruited when reward was cued cross-modally. The strongest dissociation between the intra- and cross-modal reward-driven effects was observed at the level of the feedforward and feedback connections of the visual cortex estimated from the winning model. These results suggest that in the presence of previously rewarded stimuli from different sensory modalities, a combination of domain-general and domain-specific mechanisms are recruited across the brain to adjust the visual perception.